ATHYLPS - Poker Outs, Poker Odds, Poker Trainer
Category : Card
Reviews (7)
I started with the free version but paid as I wanted to use the app for training pot odds etc. Price wise it's very good. Even if your playing at micro stakes youll recoup your investment in no time. A stand out feature I like is in the 'Should You Call?' Training, where if you are unsure of the answer or why you got it wrong, there is a full explanation of the maths involved and why it is or is not the correct call. I'd love to see an Implied Odds section to carry on the study further.
Should you call gives you wrong answers at times. Also you never know what your opponent has, for example counting 9 flush outs with K◇2♡ on a turn that is K♡ Q♡ 2♤ 8♡ when the other dude had QQ. Another example is 773 flop. Opp has 73. We have A7. Call 200 to win 1300. They say no because you have 3 outs. But in reality your outs double on the turn. That is a 16% chance to win with 15% equity needed. It also doesn't take into consideration implied pot odds. (We don't know them).
I am reviewing this based on the non payed version. Its a great app and will help any new player. It fulfils its purpose to an outstanding degree and is built perfectly.
Really good simple app. Latest update has broke pot odds exercise. Also small feature request. On the combinations exercise please keep the question the same, either what do you have or what does your opponent have?
I would pay four times more than they asking for if the app shows the correct answer and why when you are wrong.
I tried the outs exercise and answers dont make sense....answers are wrong.
Ok for the price, I am removing a star because the percentage based odds trainer rounds the math but doesn't explain how it's rounding which can be confusing and there is no option to turn the rounding off. Also I would like to see more involving implied odds, position, and hand range funnels. I removed another star because calculating odds and "should I call" doesn't think more than 1 draw ahead on the flop which is especially bad because the description says "rule of 2 and 4" not "rule of 2".